I read this morning of an important fact: in Italy fewer students choose to follow the time of Religion . Why I'm happy: - I always felt that the school should be an instrument of acculturation and diffusion of knowledge impartial and balanced in the world of ideas, which clearly is not;
- teach religion in the hour of religion is wrong, we should teach philosophy of the hour, and to analytical, not indoctrination techniques from proselytizing;
explain my points of disagreement.
The school as an instrument of acculturation and impartial dissemination of knowledge.
As a government body and the social, the school is covered with a noble task and Journal, which is to train the future citizens of Italy and Europe, if not the world, providing them with the foundations to be members of the company Useful to create rather than destroy, to ensure that your life is first useful to themselves, and then to those around us. The training often feeds a purpose, feeding minds.
For these reasons, I do not know what is shared today, the school can not provide partial views on politics or ideology, both fields within which range moves religion. Just as it is impossible to teach children how to take sides in politics, so it should be impossible to try to route them to a particular religious thought. The idea of \u200b\u200bstate religion is an unhealthy idea, which, with its roots in an inglorious past and we all know that all we pretend not to know. A State may not have a religion upon which spring up, because I can not and should not influence the course of a nation, it can not be part of civic and social bodies, has no say in the land management and government bodies, or welfare of citizens. The days of religion and power were going steady and non-open ended for centuries, although even those that "dictatorship and religion are the orgy on the balcony," as someone said, are still much alive. But Italy should not be so, it should not, right? I
slaves who wanted to remove the crucifix from classes, because it is thought a fair and consistent, in line with the democratic spirit of our constitution, with the liberal and libertine that should characterize our national identity. No political symbol, no swastikas, no hammer and sickle, no flag burning, and then nothing idelogici symbols, no crucifixes, no menorah, no crescents, no mandala or lotus flowers. And who has suggested that they were included rather than excluded the crucifix, all other religious symbols, for the sake of pluralism, I say that not only took into account the reduced size of the walls of our classrooms. If I were a parent, I worry about having a large blackboard hung in the classroom and a couple of beautiful maps, rather than a whole wall dedicated to all the abstruse religious symbols as possible - almost as obscure as electoral lists on the walls at the time of the vote.
teach religion in the hour of religion is wrong, that should be taught in philosophy.
consider what they teach at the hour of religion now and think about this: children are subjected to media bombardment from small-religious, because of parents whose deep-rooted tradition of previous parental constraints, pushing the arms of the Church Catholic their offspring. Since childhood we have been forced to give up good trilling alarm without waking up on Sunday to go to church, to make us poor legs pain in the feet or, worse, those poor knees on the wooden benches of the anti-ergonomic atonement. And then, the Catechism, this obscure instrument of indoctrination that the Church has, which would aim to achieve social status by the dark, and to which we are virtually forced the event that one day - alas - your partner decides to take advantage marriage in the Lateran Church.
So, on balance, the hour of religious instruction at school is a dual, redundant, because the Church has already gained control of the Sunday morning of all children as additional hours of religion. Considering I
religion an interesting philosophy of life, tends to eliminate the side on which religious believers try to convince the neighbors that it is based on real events. All philosophers are trying to convince us that their theories are right, that their thoughts, even confessed to not having yet reached the truth, those who are unable to reach as close as possible. Yet no Kant or Schopenhauer tried to instill their beliefs with all possible means, lawful or not - probably would have been stoned, if we were seriously tempted. But if we drop this unpleasant violent system of proselytism, religion remains an interesting philosophy. It is a fascinating excursus that of its history, as has been influential in the schedules of the power of many companies, its origins, the parallels between different cultures, it is fascinating to discover the hidden meanings of the symbols, gestures and rituals, the power of words. In religion the man is reflected as in no other philosophy, and between the intricate meshes of its mysteries, we find ourselves. What other
philosophy can arouse so much interest of truth hidden in the mysterious and radical action to unravel a complicated moment in a colorful mandala just finished? Infinite charm which is stored in the geometry of the Cube of Metatron and the Flower of Life Tree of life and its Sephiroth? Is the immense sense of power that sends the name of Allah written in the language of Islam, itself a symbol as well as a word.
And all this we lose every day because there was never taught. During the time of religion is thought only to tell stories, but always picturesque equal to themselves, on loaves and fishes, resurrections and boring warnings. Religion should be part of our cultural heritage extended, with the comparative history of all beliefs, not with the surgical examination of the folklore of one of them, led by those who have an interest in driving it for their own purposes. Religion should be a matter of analysis led by those who know some of their mechanisms human thought in history, who knows all the ways in which man in history has begun the search for truth.
consider what they teach at the hour of religion now and think about this: children are subjected to media bombardment from small-religious, because of parents whose deep-rooted tradition of previous parental constraints, pushing the arms of the Church Catholic their offspring. Since childhood we have been forced to give up good trilling alarm without waking up on Sunday to go to church, to make us poor legs pain in the feet or, worse, those poor knees on the wooden benches of the anti-ergonomic atonement. And then, the Catechism, this obscure instrument of indoctrination that the Church has, which would aim to achieve social status by the dark, and to which we are virtually forced the event that one day - alas - your partner decides to take advantage marriage in the Lateran Church.
So, on balance, the hour of religious instruction at school is a dual, redundant, because the Church has already gained control of the Sunday morning of all children as additional hours of religion. Considering I
religion an interesting philosophy of life, tends to eliminate the side on which religious believers try to convince the neighbors that it is based on real events. All philosophers are trying to convince us that their theories are right, that their thoughts, even confessed to not having yet reached the truth, those who are unable to reach as close as possible. Yet no Kant or Schopenhauer tried to instill their beliefs with all possible means, lawful or not - probably would have been stoned, if we were seriously tempted. But if we drop this unpleasant violent system of proselytism, religion remains an interesting philosophy. It is a fascinating excursus that of its history, as has been influential in the schedules of the power of many companies, its origins, the parallels between different cultures, it is fascinating to discover the hidden meanings of the symbols, gestures and rituals, the power of words. In religion the man is reflected as in no other philosophy, and between the intricate meshes of its mysteries, we find ourselves. What other
philosophy can arouse so much interest of truth hidden in the mysterious and radical action to unravel a complicated moment in a colorful mandala just finished? Infinite charm which is stored in the geometry of the Cube of Metatron and the Flower of Life Tree of life and its Sephiroth? Is the immense sense of power that sends the name of Allah written in the language of Islam, itself a symbol as well as a word.
And all this we lose every day because there was never taught. During the time of religion is thought only to tell stories, but always picturesque equal to themselves, on loaves and fishes, resurrections and boring warnings. Religion should be part of our cultural heritage extended, with the comparative history of all beliefs, not with the surgical examination of the folklore of one of them, led by those who have an interest in driving it for their own purposes. Religion should be a matter of analysis led by those who know some of their mechanisms human thought in history, who knows all the ways in which man in history has begun the search for truth.
Since the time of a train of religion Lateran Pacts, which can not be wrong.
This is the easy part: the Church has made a deal with a dictatorial government of fascist of the worst, what has given rise to all modern dictatorships, including Nazism. Any agreement born of such a situation, for me, is to be considered impious, immoral, and those who continue to exploit the constraints is to be considered equally.
The power that has the Vatican in Italy is mainly moral, a oppressive power more than any other, but is supported by another kind of power, rooted through the territory and state agencies and laws, a situation unacceptable in a modern democracy. Italian citizens often do not think all this, convinced that it is just another effect of segregation of mind, a typical automatic psychological attitude of the victim of a segregation accepts his situation, albeit unacceptable, because it is convinced that car is just so .
Moreover, in a country where you appeal to national identity while giving praise to God, as in a famous verse of a minstrel song from unlikely principles, one can not but observe how the thought of identity philosophical and religious identity is inseparable from the national-territorial.
Fortunately things are changing ... also because of factors outside the EU, which once again show us that to be honest citizens, and educated workers, such as integrated families who bring their children to school and they lower the average time visitors to religion, do not necessarily belong to the so-called State Religion. Their rejection of religion leads us to the time a simple reason: with the growth of foreign labor, and the presence of an increasing number of foreigners in various areas within the Italian society, have a sense of time Catholic religion?
the rest of Italy is a country of contradictions and paradoxes, the irregularity as a culture. We are the only country in the world to house an entire state party is run by a religious power, temporal, on balance, to which we give more power every day, in every field. A state that has many properties within our territory, and privileges that no foreign country has ever had in Italy or the rest of the world. A state that has legalized the possession of a claim our souls.
Which is why the statistics on the time of religion can only rise.
This is the easy part: the Church has made a deal with a dictatorial government of fascist of the worst, what has given rise to all modern dictatorships, including Nazism. Any agreement born of such a situation, for me, is to be considered impious, immoral, and those who continue to exploit the constraints is to be considered equally.
The power that has the Vatican in Italy is mainly moral, a oppressive power more than any other, but is supported by another kind of power, rooted through the territory and state agencies and laws, a situation unacceptable in a modern democracy. Italian citizens often do not think all this, convinced that it is just another effect of segregation of mind, a typical automatic psychological attitude of the victim of a segregation accepts his situation, albeit unacceptable, because it is convinced that car is just so .
Moreover, in a country where you appeal to national identity while giving praise to God, as in a famous verse of a minstrel song from unlikely principles, one can not but observe how the thought of identity philosophical and religious identity is inseparable from the national-territorial.
Fortunately things are changing ... also because of factors outside the EU, which once again show us that to be honest citizens, and educated workers, such as integrated families who bring their children to school and they lower the average time visitors to religion, do not necessarily belong to the so-called State Religion. Their rejection of religion leads us to the time a simple reason: with the growth of foreign labor, and the presence of an increasing number of foreigners in various areas within the Italian society, have a sense of time Catholic religion?
the rest of Italy is a country of contradictions and paradoxes, the irregularity as a culture. We are the only country in the world to house an entire state party is run by a religious power, temporal, on balance, to which we give more power every day, in every field. A state that has many properties within our territory, and privileges that no foreign country has ever had in Italy or the rest of the world. A state that has legalized the possession of a claim our souls.
Which is why the statistics on the time of religion can only rise.
0 comments:
Post a Comment