"He has blasphemed! Ass Now you'll see that the bishops will" have murmured left hanging on the skirts of devout mother Church. It seemed almost done, and yet here is the intervention of Monsignor Fisichella, pilot and famous exponent of the modern church, which called to overlook: the curse, he says, "must be contextualized." In short, in male un'ammuffita story that lampoons political opponent because it is not enough pussy, a porcodio there may well be. But how to distinguish the right environment from non-eligible? We spoke with Fr Robert, writer, theologian, pipe smoker. We present anew the interview, the rest remains with us.
Padre Roberto, the Church open to interpretation, therefore, more flexible in the second commandment. This applies only to the jokes?
Well, if the joke is perhaps the ultimate case to open a discourse on the legality or otherwise of certain exclamations. It 'clear that if the functional to achieve a comic effect, blasphemy becomes crucial. Eliminating the curse would do down the scaffolding on which rests the comic gags. Similarly, if at the end of the joke, instead of "Orcodio!" (In consonance with the orchid named shortly before), the premier had said "porcodio", the joke would not make sense, and the blasphemy was to blame.
Sure, but there are cases where the blasphemy is not essential, but gives more effect to gag already quite bold. For example, knows the joke of Jesus, Peter and Judas go to hell?
Yes, the Pope Luciani told all the time.
However, when Fisichella calls in context, opens up a wider range of scenarios of the joke, in whom we can take the name of God in vain, juxtaposed various species of animals and not viviparous. Can you give some examples?
The classic example is the interlayer. Many seniors, especially in Veneto, Tuscany, make use dell'esclamazione "diocane" as if to say "Ah!", "Veh", "Ohibò." I remember Once, during a summer training camp, I stopped in playing gin rummy at a bar with some old Boiago of the place. I asked for some information on play to Mr. Bepi, which he said: "The effects of combinations of the scale, diocan!, The ace has a double value, diocan!: One can rely, diocan!, And then serve for a scale of Ace, 2.3, diocan! Or diocan!, apply to paper over the Kings, diocan!, and then used for the scale Q, K, Ace, diocan! The wildcard diocan!, can take without distinction, diocan !, all values \u200b\u200bof all seeds, diocan!, and thus serves the purposes, diocan!, any combination. " He understands that in such contexts is blasphemy desemantizzata and can not therefore be interpreted stricto sensu as a deliberate insult to our Lord.
Also because God did not exist, can hardly take offense. But let us. I often invoke the Almighty Most High that you do not throw anything away. Again, how to distinguish when it is good and when it is bad?
You must go to good sense, as always. For example, I happen to mention the Virgin Mary when getting up from his desk, knock knee against the edge of the table. But in this case is nothing more than yet another exclamation, if we are colorful, but certainly desemantizzata like those of older people in the bar. Do not mean to blame the Virgin Mary in my pain, let alone consciously say that she did commercialization of their bodies. So it is not offensive, but simply that interjection is contextualized. However, Pope Benedict XVI is preparing to publish an encyclical, which should shed light on the legality or otherwise of blasphemy in certain situations. Surprises in store.
There can not anticipate anything?
For now I only read the introduction, one in which His Holiness cheers fiery lovers, saying that the Madonna swearing during a particularly intense orgasm is basically a venial sin.
0 comments:
Post a Comment